<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are &#8220;Boom Times&#8221; back for real estate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unconditional.co.nz/blog/are-boom-times-back-for-real-estate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unconditional.co.nz/blog/are-boom-times-back-for-real-estate/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s really going on in realestate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:57:32 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alistair Helm</title>
		<link>http://unconditional.co.nz/blog/are-boom-times-back-for-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-2683</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair Helm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconditional.co.nz/blog/?p=4541#comment-2683</guid>
		<description>Mainlander

I think I can see the question you raise, however I would like to clarify and reinforce there is not a double standard.

The Westpac report states that the number of houses listed on the market has fallen. I say no. I base this on the facts in the NZ Property Report for October which showed that the number of listings in October was higher than September - fact. In addition I make point to the fact that inventory as measured in equivalent weeks of sales rose in October.

For clarification I did make the comment in that report that on a comparable basis this year has seen a lower seasonal lift in new listings - this I would judge to indicate that the market is not in a boom - further strengthening the argument I have to the data set used to justify the Westpac report claims.

I hope that provides clarity around the message of this blog post and the report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mainlander</p>
<p>I think I can see the question you raise, however I would like to clarify and reinforce there is not a double standard.</p>
<p>The Westpac report states that the number of houses listed on the market has fallen. I say no. I base this on the facts in the NZ Property Report for October which showed that the number of listings in October was higher than September &#8211; fact. In addition I make point to the fact that inventory as measured in equivalent weeks of sales rose in October.</p>
<p>For clarification I did make the comment in that report that on a comparable basis this year has seen a lower seasonal lift in new listings &#8211; this I would judge to indicate that the market is not in a boom &#8211; further strengthening the argument I have to the data set used to justify the Westpac report claims.</p>
<p>I hope that provides clarity around the message of this blog post and the report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mainlander</title>
		<link>http://unconditional.co.nz/blog/are-boom-times-back-for-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-2684</link>
		<dc:creator>Mainlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconditional.co.nz/blog/?p=4541#comment-2684</guid>
		<description>As I have noted over recent months, and am happy to admit your comments seem to lend a neutral basis to the overall &quot;Press&quot; generated housing market sentiment. I am curious though about your statement referencing number of houses on the market falling...and in yr words ....&quot;wrong&quot;....I forward the fact that even yr own property report suggests otherwise regarding falling numbers as evidenced by your Property report associated graphics. Why the difference? A double standard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I have noted over recent months, and am happy to admit your comments seem to lend a neutral basis to the overall &#8220;Press&#8221; generated housing market sentiment. I am curious though about your statement referencing number of houses on the market falling&#8230;and in yr words &#8230;.&#8221;wrong&#8221;&#8230;.I forward the fact that even yr own property report suggests otherwise regarding falling numbers as evidenced by your Property report associated graphics. Why the difference? A double standard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greig Metcalfe</title>
		<link>http://unconditional.co.nz/blog/are-boom-times-back-for-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-2660</link>
		<dc:creator>Greig Metcalfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconditional.co.nz/blog/?p=4541#comment-2660</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking on the banks in particular Westpac - they seem to come out with this sort of sensational headline everytime they want some media coverage.

In Hamilton the market has slowed to an 8 month low of 214 sales in October down from the best month of the year April with 259 for more detail on Hamilton see my http://www.unconditional.co.nz/greigs/2009/11/16/hamilton-housing-market-crashes-in-october/blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking on the banks in particular Westpac &#8211; they seem to come out with this sort of sensational headline everytime they want some media coverage.</p>
<p>In Hamilton the market has slowed to an 8 month low of 214 sales in October down from the best month of the year April with 259 for more detail on Hamilton see my <a href="http://www.unconditional.co.nz/greigs/2009/11/16/hamilton-housing-market-crashes-in-october/blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.unconditional.co.nz/greigs/2009/11/16/hamilton-housing-market-crashes-in-october/blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair Helm</title>
		<link>http://unconditional.co.nz/blog/are-boom-times-back-for-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-2663</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair Helm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconditional.co.nz/blog/?p=4541#comment-2663</guid>
		<description>Steve

Good to have your comments - has been a while and thanks for those words.

It has always been the intent of the blog to offer an impartial perspective; for me that has maybe taken a time to establish and build confidence in establishing.

I must look out for this book - Peter Schiff is certainly highly referenced in his prediction of the great recession.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve</p>
<p>Good to have your comments &#8211; has been a while and thanks for those words.</p>
<p>It has always been the intent of the blog to offer an impartial perspective; for me that has maybe taken a time to establish and build confidence in establishing.</p>
<p>I must look out for this book &#8211; Peter Schiff is certainly highly referenced in his prediction of the great recession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Netwriter</title>
		<link>http://unconditional.co.nz/blog/are-boom-times-back-for-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-2662</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Netwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconditional.co.nz/blog/?p=4541#comment-2662</guid>
		<description>Hi Alistair,
It&#039;s been a while.
Of course there are vested interests. Those who have reason to positively promote a bullish housing market.
Among those are banks and real estate agents.

In this case, I must commend you and your article for its lack of bias.

By the way, if you haven&#039;t, I thoroughly recommend Peter Schiff&#039;s book &quot;Crash Proof&quot;. There is a new 2009 version out.
It&#039;s amazingly insightful with respect to economics, and housing markets.
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alistair,<br />
It&#8217;s been a while.<br />
Of course there are vested interests. Those who have reason to positively promote a bullish housing market.<br />
Among those are banks and real estate agents.</p>
<p>In this case, I must commend you and your article for its lack of bias.</p>
<p>By the way, if you haven&#8217;t, I thoroughly recommend Peter Schiff&#8217;s book &#8220;Crash Proof&#8221;. There is a new 2009 version out.<br />
It&#8217;s amazingly insightful with respect to economics, and housing markets.<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://unconditional.co.nz/blog/are-boom-times-back-for-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-2661</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconditional.co.nz/blog/?p=4541#comment-2661</guid>
		<description>The property market is not one homogenous market. In some areas, Westpac&#039;s predictions may come true but are less likely to be true for other areas. That&#039;s an issue when we look at averages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The property market is not one homogenous market. In some areas, Westpac&#8217;s predictions may come true but are less likely to be true for other areas. That&#8217;s an issue when we look at averages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair Helm</title>
		<link>http://unconditional.co.nz/blog/are-boom-times-back-for-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair Helm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconditional.co.nz/blog/?p=4541#comment-2665</guid>
		<description>Russell

The full details for October are provided in the NZ Property Report for October as published on this blog on 1st November.

A quick check reveals that for the first 13 days of November we have seen 6,525 new residential listings come onto the site - the same period in 2008 saw 6,059 - an 8% increase.

A key point is that November 2008 was the point at which the NZ property market turned as sales had been so low that listings started to dry up - November is normally one of the two highest months and usually higher than October - not so last year.

By comparison the same figure of new listings in the first 13 days of November 2007 was 7,615.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russell</p>
<p>The full details for October are provided in the NZ Property Report for October as published on this blog on 1st November.</p>
<p>A quick check reveals that for the first 13 days of November we have seen 6,525 new residential listings come onto the site &#8211; the same period in 2008 saw 6,059 &#8211; an 8% increase.</p>
<p>A key point is that November 2008 was the point at which the NZ property market turned as sales had been so low that listings started to dry up &#8211; November is normally one of the two highest months and usually higher than October &#8211; not so last year.</p>
<p>By comparison the same figure of new listings in the first 13 days of November 2007 was 7,615.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://unconditional.co.nz/blog/are-boom-times-back-for-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-2664</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unconditional.co.nz/blog/?p=4541#comment-2664</guid>
		<description>Can you advise how many properties are being addded to realestate.co.nz each day/week over Oct/Nov and how does that compare with last year.

Of most interest would be the first 14 days of November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you advise how many properties are being addded to realestate.co.nz each day/week over Oct/Nov and how does that compare with last year.</p>
<p>Of most interest would be the first 14 days of November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>